Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Yeshiva of Far Rockaway

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1975PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The case comes to this court upon affirmed findings of fact that (1) the properties owned by plaintiffs and defendant, along with other neighboring and contiguous lots, were encumbered with specific restrictive covenants, prohibiting their use for any purpose “ except for one private residence ”, that (2) “ concededly with knowledge of the covenant and of the plaintiffs’ intention to enforce it ”, defendant purchased one of the restricted properties and commenced using it for a purpose "violative of the covenant, and finally, that “ the are.a retains a residential character of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Friends of Shawangunks, Inc. v. KnowltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Gordon v. Incorporated Village of LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Rautenstrauch v. BakhruAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Incorporated Village of Babylon v. John Anthony's Water Cafe, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Cornell University v. BagnardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API