Legal Opinion
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. California
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 3, 1981No. Civ.No. S-79-857 MLSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
MILTON L. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs herein seek declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to Article I, § 7(a)1 of the California Constitution. Plaintiffs allege that this constitutional provision, which was enacted pursuant to a *1248vote of the state’s citizens, is racially discriminatory and that it therefore abridges the rights of plaintiffs to equal protection of the laws and equal educational opportunities. Plaintiffs pray for an order declaring Article I, § 7(a) unconstitutional under both the federal and state constitutions, and enjoining the defendants and…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Okpalobi v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Harris v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1981
- NAACP v. State of Cal.District Court, E.D. California · 1981
- Ifeanyi Charles Anthony Okpalobi v. Mike FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Manchin v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.