McCue v. McCue
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
We take up the assignments of error, so far as they are pursued on the brief, in their order.
Assignment No. 3. In charging the jury that an instrument may properly be signed on one day and acknowledged before a notary public at a later date, the court dwelt somewhat on the fact that the personal appearance before the notary was the important thing in the acknowledgment, and concluded with these words: “that is the important thing, and not whether the paper was actually signed in his presence. If he acknowledges the signature, that is all right.” This was said with reference to the power of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barlow Bros. Co. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Schmeltz v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Weiner v. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Roberts v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Walsh v. StudwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.