Kates v. Bok
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Gustav Bok and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew-York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 15th day of March, 1910, continuing in part an in junction and resettling an order entered on the 10th day of February, 1910, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 9th day of February, 1910, denying the defendants’ motion for a reargument of a motion to continue…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendants, Gustav Bok and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew-York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 15th day of March, 1910, continuing in part an in junction and resettling an order entered on the 10th day of February, 1910, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 9th day of February, 1910, denying the defendants’ motion for a reargument of a motion to continue the injunction. Appeal by the plaintiff, Xorbert B. Kates, from so much of the order entered on the 15th day of March,…
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
These are cross-appeals from an order of the Special Term continuing in part pendente lite a temporary injunction.
The plaintiff and the defendant Bok were until May 3, 1906, copartners in business under the firm name or style of Kates & Bok. The defendant Semerad was in their employ in what seems to have been a highly confidential relation, having a contingent interest in the profits of the business. The business of the firm consisted largely of exporting merchandise to ports in South America, Central America and the West Indies. The copartnership would have expired by limitation on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Von Bremen v. MacMonniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910