Legal Opinion

Corley v. Hubbard

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1935No. 29271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover damages in the sum of $25,000 for personal injuries suffered by Fidelia Corley, plaintiff, as the result of a fall caused by a dog which Sarah A. Hubbard, defendant, owned and harbored in and about her home at 1909 F street, Lincoln, Nebraska. Plaintiff was defendant’s housekeeper, nurse and companion. On the morning of October 3, 1933, when plaintiff was on a rear porch where there was no railing, the dog ran between her feet and tripped her. While unbalanced, she fell three feet from the open porch floor onto the ground or a concrete driveway and was severely…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Moriarty v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Underhill v. HobelmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Gamble v. GambleNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Groat v. ClausenNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Western Contracting Corp. v. OdleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API