Aaron Stanz, individually and derivatively on behalf of Jet Genuis Holdings, Inc. v. Jordan Brown, et al.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 AARON STANZ, individually and Case No.: 22-cv-01164-GPC-JLB derivatively on behalf of Jet Genuis 14 Holdings, Inc., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 15 REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES Plaintiff, AND REPORT AND 16 v. RECOMMENDATION RE: 17 PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE JORDAN BROWN, et al., APPLICATION FOR OSC AS TO 18 Defendants. WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT 19 BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR FAILING TO 20 COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER 21 [ECF No. 217] 22 23 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 24 25 Before the Court is Plaintiff Aaron…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.