United States v. Carlos Galvan Escobar
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:
Carlos Gerardo Galvan Escobar pleaded guilty to unlawful reentry following removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). At sentencing, he argued that his mental health and drug abuse issues warranted leniency. The district court agreed. So it announced a below-Guidelines sentence. Escobar responded that he might not be eligible for mental health or drug abuse treatment programs in prison. The court again agreed. It therefore expressed hope Galvan Escobar could get help—and even recommended treatment—but conceded the sentence might be too brief for him to join a prison…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tapia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Jose Escalante-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Fernandez-CuscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jason ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Francisco Rodriguez-SaldanaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020