People v. Urbano
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOMES, J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant Raymond Guadalupe Urbano argues that the admission in evidence at trial of a comment and a gesture he made to his attorney in the jury box of his preliminary hearing courtroom while court was not in session violated the attorney-client privilege. He argues that the court’s denial without jury findings of his motions to strike both his strike prior and his criminal street gang enhancement and the court’s imposition without jury findings of an additional restitution fine and an additional parole revocation restitution fine violate Blakely v. Washington…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. RhoadesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. KramisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. ShrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. Bell CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Cains CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.