Legal Opinion

State v. Cardenas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 25, 1985No. 2 CA-CR 3578PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of child molesting and given a mitigated sentence. On appeal he makes four contentions:

1) He was denied a fair trial because television was permitted in the courtroom after the trial had commenced,

2) He was denied a fair trial because the prosecutor repeatedly referred to media portrayals of child molestation,

3) The prosecutor misstated the burden of proof in rebuttal closing argument, and

4) The evidence was insufficient.

We affirm.

The facts considered in the light most favorable to sustain the jury verdict follow.

The appellant was seated in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chandler v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HannaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API