Legal Opinion
Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 27, 1958No. 13996_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the Federal Communications Commission, granting television Channel 9 in Orlando, Florida, to intervenor Mid-Florida Television Corporation. Appellant, the unsuccessful applicant, challenges the Commission’s action. After reviewing appellant’s contentions, we find no basis for disturbing the Commission’s award. See Tampa Times Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 256, 230 F.2d 224.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tampa Times Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Tampa Television Company, Intervenor. Orange Television Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Tampa Television Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Tampa Times Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- TV 9, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Comint Corporation and Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenors. Comint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.