Legal Opinion

Bemboom v. National Surety Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1947No. 34,448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Plaintiffs contend that, although the alleged heir at law and devisees did not prove a case, the administrator de bonis non is entitled on this record to recover against the surety on the deceased administrator's bond on the alleged devastavit. The answer to the question now for the first time presented rests in a determination of the problem as to in whom and against whom a cause of action arises when such a devastavit is committed.

At common law, to an administrator de bonis non was committed only the administration of such goods, chattels, and credits of the deceased as had not been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Balch v. HooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Miller v. HobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bemboom v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API