Johnson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
The appellant was convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore as a second offender against the narcotics laws. Asserting that he was indigent, he duly moved for a new trial before the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City and requested a free transcript of the testimony at his trial. Rule 30 (C-l) of the Supreme Bench requires one convicted in the Criminal Courts of Baltimore to file the original and three copies of the transcript of the testimony as a condition precedent to the hearing of his motion for a new trial. See Majority Opinion of Supreme Bench in Jackson v. State, Daily Record of March…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- State v. McCordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Roth v. House of RefugeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. Devers and WebsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Woodell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Pearlman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.