Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 1959No. [No. 224, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The appellant was convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore as a second offender against the narcotics laws. Asserting that he was indigent, he duly moved for a new trial before the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City and requested a free transcript of the testimony at his trial. Rule 30 (C-l) of the Supreme Bench requires one convicted in the Criminal Courts of Baltimore to file the original and three copies of the transcript of the testimony as a condition precedent to the hearing of his motion for a new trial. See Majority Opinion of Supreme Bench in Jackson v. State, Daily Record of March…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. State v. McCordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Roth v. House of RefugeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. State v. Devers and WebsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Woodell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Pearlman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API