Legal Opinion
Hannon v. Cuomo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1980PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On this record, there was substantial evidence to support the respondent’s conclusion. Nor can be it said that the penalty is shocking “to one’s sense of fairness” (Matter of Butterly & Green v Lomenzo, 36 NY2d 250, 256; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 223). It also appears that the notice and complaint served upon the appellant comported with the requirements of due process.
*777Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Gabrielli taking no…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Butterly & Green, Inc. v. LomenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FoschioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Government Employees Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Rustine v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Dunn Appraisal Co. v. FoschioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Little Reb Auto Corp. v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.