Legal Opinion · Dissent

General Mills, Inc. v. Steele

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1946No. 11313Published

1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge

T deprecate as much as my associates do the fact that appellee, a trusted employee of appellant and well represented by counsel, has welshed on his agreement, deliberately and thoughtfully entered into on advice of counsel, and in the name of the law is profiting thereby. But I cannot agree that appellant may in law be allowed to have the service performed without paying the statutory rate it agreed, and the law compelled it to pay. I think it clear that the district judge was right in the view he took, that the authorities in Texas leave in no doubt that rates prescribed by the Texas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Battles v. Braniff Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Bowen Motor Coaches, Inc. v. New York Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. Herrin Transp. Co. v. MarmionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. C. & S. Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API