Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Cangiano

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 26, 1972No. 592-4, 618-19, Docket 71-2104-8PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:

These appeals call upon us to decide difficult questions under the First and Fourth Amendments arising in the context of a prosecution for transporting obscene materials in interstate commerce for the purpose of sale.

Appellants Frank Cangiano, Cosmo Cangiano, Ariale, Gambardella and De-Ramo appeal from judgments of conviction entered after a twelve day jury trial in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jacob Mishler, Chief Judge, finding them guilty of transporting obscene materials in interstate commerce for the purpose of sale and conspiring to do…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. John CapraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Ronald Deberry and Julius EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Dennis E. PrybaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Paul Howard Gumerlock, United States of America v. Marc Paul FannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Cosmo 'Gus' Cangiano and Elana Marie IsolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API