Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 5, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

*677The appellant was a traveling salesman for a clothing firm. On April 18, 1911, he was at Pikeville, Kentucky, and desiring to go in the prosecution of his business to Prestonbnrg, a short distance away, he. checked his trunks of sample clothing from Pikeville to Prestonbnrg, and they should have been sent on the train leaving Pikeville at 12:30 p. m., and have arrived at Prestonbnrg on the same day a few hours later. He went from Pikeville to Prestonbnrg on this train, but the railway company failed to forward on the train his trunks as it should…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. S. Wilson & Co. v. Dickenson County BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. George Schechter & Co. v. Farmers National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API