Greg Kroupa v. Peter Nielsen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentBye, Circuit Judge
In my view, B.K. has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits nor a threat of irreparable harm. I would reverse the decision of the district court and vacate the preliminary injunction.
B.K. has not demonstrated a fair chance of prevailing on the merits of her procedural due process claim because she was not deprived of a protected liberty or property interest. The primary injury alleged by B.K. is the harm to her reputation for honesty and integrity. Yet, an individual’s reputation, alone, is not a protected liberty or property interest. Neal v. Fields, 429 F.3d 1165, 1167 (8th…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Seamons v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- S.J.W. Ex Rel. Wilson v. Lee's Summit R-7 School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.