Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Barber v. Rhodes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1956No. 34679Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff claims that jurisdiction has been obtained over the defendant state officers by the issuance of process in this action and that they may be required to respond, to summons issued by the Common Pleas Court of Fulton County, as codefendants with certain officers of that county by virtue of the provisions of Section 2703.04, Revised Code, the pertinent part of which is as follows:

“When the action is rightly brought in any county, according to Sections 2307.32 to 2307.40, inclusive, of the Revised Code, a summons may be issued to any other county against one or more of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephens v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. Hawley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Huber v. WannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. VermillionOhio Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API