Daner Ford v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
KITCHENS, JUSTICE,
DISSENTING:
¶45. I respectfully dissent for two reasons. First, I find that the flight instruction was not warranted in this case. Second, as I previously have written, I would abolish the flight instruction altogether.
¶46. In the present case, Instruction S-7 informed the jury:
[T]hat “flight” is a circumstance from which guilty knowledge and fear may be inferred. If you believe from the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant, DANER FORD, did flee or go into hiding, such flight or hiding is to be considered in connection with all other events in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Fairchild v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Colburn v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Randolph v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Harrell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.