Legal Opinion

Applied Biochemists, Inc. v. a & V, INC.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 10, 1973No. 72-C-429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The defendants in this patent infringement action manufacture and market algaecides which are alleged to be identical to the plaintiffs’ patented products, Cutrine and Swimtrine. The patent here in question, 2,734,028, expires February 8, 1973. It is these facts which have provoked the defendants’ motions which will be resolved in this decision.

The defendants note that algaecides have their greatest consumer use during the summer months of the year and that manufacturers often offer incentive programs to dealers and distributors which are directed at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Maclaren v. B-I-W Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  3. Embassy Industries, Inc. v. Federal Boiler Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Airtex Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Shelley Radiant Ceiling Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. Pacific Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Preview Furniture Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1985
  3. AIRTEX CORPORATION v. Shelley Radiant Ceiling Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API