Legal Opinion

United States v. Mehta

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 3, 2004No. CRIM.01-10180-NGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

GERTNER, District Judge.

Mukund N. Mehta (“Mehta”) pleaded guilty on March 11, 2003, to a multiple count Indictment charging him with tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201, and mail/wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and 1343. The charges relate to a Needham, Massachusetts, photocopy business that Mehta operated under a franchise agreement with Sir Speedy, Inc. (“Sir Speedy”). Since Mehta’s criminal history was as low as it could be, a Category I, the sentencing range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines was driven almost entirely by the offense…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Hiroyasu Takai Akiko MagnesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. ThurstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HawkinsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. United States v. WillisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API