Anderson v. Pilgram
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Wallace, J., Spartanburg, July, 1893. Action by W. A. and L. S. Anderson, in behalf of themselves and other creditors, against S. M. Pilgram, Lula Pilgram, E. S. Darwin, and Sallie A. Darwin.
Read the full summary
Before Wallace, J., Spartanburg, July, 1893. Action by W. A. and L. S. Anderson, in behalf of themselves and other creditors, against S. M. Pilgram, Lula Pilgram, E. S. Darwin, and Sallie A. Darwin. The report of the master, H. B. Carlisle, was as follows: This is an action brought by the plaintiffs herein and others, creditors of S. M. Pilgram, to set aside as fraudulent and void, certain transfers and compromises made by him, whereby they claim to have been prevented from collecting their just debts. The facts out of which this arose are as follows: On September 29th, 1883, S. M. Pilgram…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice McIveb.
The plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of the defendant, S. M. Pilgram, bring this action on behalf of themselves, as well as all other judgment creditors of the said Pilgram, who shall come in and seek relief thereby, and contribute to the expenses thereof, for the purpose of setting aside as fraudulent a compromise of a certain debt held by said Pilgram against his codefendants, E. S. Darwin and S. A. Darwin, as well as the transfer of certain notes originally held by Pilgram, one against both of the said Darwins and the other…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hursey v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916