Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Matter of Estate of Hunt

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1992No. 890469Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

(Concurring and Dissenting)

I would dismiss the appeal.

Hunt quite plainly brought this appeal in his capacity as personal representative of the estate. That much is clear from the notice of appeal filed by “Richard L. Hunt, Personal Representative of the Estate of Reed Dwane Hunt” on October 6, 1989. Hunt then resigned as personal representative of the estate on November 9, 1989. No one has moved to substitute a successor personal representative as appellant in this appeal. Thus, there has been a failure to substitute parties pursuant to rule 38(b) of the Utah Rules of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Society of Professional Journalists v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Provo City Corp. v. WilldenUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Terracor v. Utah Board of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Jenkins v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API