Geiger v. Carolina Pool Equipment Distributors, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment. The motion was made pursuant to Circuit Court Rule 44, as amended. Respondent’s contention that the order is not directly appealable is sustained.
An order denying a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory decision and not directly appealable. The following from 4 Am. Jur. (2d) Appeal and Error, Section 104. p. 622, states the foregoing general rule and the reasons underlying it:
“However, the prevailing view seems to be that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory decision only and therefore…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Baber v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Medlock v. Nest Egg Society Today, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Greenwich Savings Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.