Legal Opinion

Geiger v. Carolina Pool Equipment Distributors, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1971No. 19304PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment. The motion was made pursuant to Circuit Court Rule 44, as amended. Respondent’s contention that the order is not directly appealable is sustained.

An order denying a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory decision and not directly appealable. The following from 4 Am. Jur. (2d) Appeal and Error, Section 104. p. 622, states the foregoing general rule and the reasons underlying it:

“However, the prevailing view seems to be that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory decision only and therefore…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Baber v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Medlock v. Nest Egg Society Today, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Greenwich Savings Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API