Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hawaii Insurers Council v. Lingle

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2008No. 27840Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

WATANABE, Presiding J.

I agree with the majority that the assessments imposed against insurers by the Hawaii Insurance Commissioner (the Commissioner) pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 431:2-215 are problematic under McCandless v. Campbell, 20 Haw. 411 (1911), and State v. Medeiros, 89 Hawai'i 361, 973 P.2d 736 (1999). I am also troubled that the amounts of past assessments were apparently determined by the Commissioner without following the rulemaking procedures set forth in the Hawaii Administrative Procedures Act, HRS chapter 91. See Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. San Juan Cellular Telephone Company, Etc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing AuthorityHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API