Legal Opinion
Vicaro v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 1935No. 1463PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DORE, Judge.
The statement of this case cannot be better stated than by the defendants themselves, quoting from their brief:
“Plaintiff sues Antonio Húngaro and New Amsterdam Casualty Company, his insurer, in solido, for $6929.00 for damages which he alleges were sustained by him when he was injured on January 2, 1933, by Lungaro’s car, when the latter was attempting to turn his car in the River Road in this pai’ish at the main entrance to Fred Conrad’s place.
“The plaintiff’s theory of the case is that while he was standing in the road about three feet tó the right of the right front door of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oliver v. WeaverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Grimes v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- James v. KrauseSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950