People v. Windholz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Louis Windholz, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Onondaga Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Oneida on the. 4th day of November, 1901, as amended by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 19th day of November, 1901, denying said defendant’s, motion to vacate an injunction order granted by the county judge, of Oneida county, enjoining the defendants from selling vinegar containing certain…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant, Louis Windholz, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Onondaga Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Oneida on the. 4th day of November, 1901, as amended by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 19th day of November, 1901, denying said defendant’s, motion to vacate an injunction order granted by the county judge, of Oneida county, enjoining the defendants from selling vinegar containing certain specified ingredients. ■
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J.:
The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars-costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
The action was brought against Windholz, residing and doing business in Syracuse, and Crouse & Sons, residing and doing business in Utica, to recover penalties for alleged violations of sections. 50-53 of the Agricultural Law (Laws of 1893, chap. 338, as amd., by Laws of 1901, chap. 308), relating to the illegal sale of adulterated vinegar. It was claimed that the vinegar was sold by Windholz to Crouse & Sons in large quantities, and by Crouse &…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. BraestedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wheaton v. SlatteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- People v. WindholzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902