Legal Opinion

AutoNation, Inc. v. Hatfield

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 2, 2006No. 14-05-00350-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.

This is an accelerated appeal from a temporary injunction. Trial court proceedings have been stayed until disposition of the appeal. Appellants challenge the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction. We affirm.

Appellee Garrick Hatfield was formerly employed in Texas by appellant Auto M. Imports, which is owned by appellant Au-tonation. 1 When hired by Autonation, Hatfield signed an employment contract and a second contract that included a non-compete agreement. The non-compete agreement contained a forum selection provision requiring lawsuits to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. Cook United, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In Re AutoNation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Intercontinental Terminals Co. v. Vopak North America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. El Tacaso, Inc. v. Jireh Star, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. Independent Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Collins, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Kotz v. Imperial Capital Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API