Martz v. Newton
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Johnson District Court. Action brought by Martz against Newton, for partition‘of certain real estate. The cause was submitted to the court on an agreed statement of facts, at the June Term, 1881, and judgment rendered for the defendant at the November Term, 1881. The plaintiff brings the ease here for review. The acts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The plaintiff alleged in her petition that she was at the commencement of this action the owner in fee of the undivided one-half of certain real estate situate in Johnson county, and demanded partition thereof. The case was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts, and thereon the court found as its conclusions of fact substantially as follows: That Cornelius Deweese and the plaintiff, Margaret Martz, were married on November 5, 1868, and cohabited together from that time until about the 15th day of August, 1870, as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Maxson v. HustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Jordan v. KyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peters v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Douglass v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904