Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Superior Rapid Transit Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Douglas •county: Charles SMITH, Judge. North Third street, which is sixty feet between the curb lines, runs east and west in West Superior. The defendant •owns and operates an electric railway along that street.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Douglas •county: Charles SMITH, Judge. North Third street, which is sixty feet between the curb lines, runs east and west in West Superior. The defendant •owns and operates an electric railway along that street. On September 1,1893, between 4 and 5 o’clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff was riding west, with Mrs. Jones and Mrs. Little, in a covered phaeton, with the top up and no curtains •on the sides, upon the south side of the track on said street, between Lamborn and Tower avenues. Mrs. Jones was driving, and an experienced driver, and…

1Opinion of the Court

Cassoday, 0. J.

1. The case of Mrs. Little, mentioned ini the foregoing statement, was before this court, and reversed for errors. Little v. Superior R. T. R. Co. 88 Wis. 402. It was there, in effect, held that the portion of the charge to the effect that the plaintiff could recover, even in a case where both parties were guilty of a want of ordinary care, was error. The same error is present in this case, where the court charged the jury to the effect that, even if the plaintiff was. chargeable with a lack of ordinary care, still the plaintiff should recover, if “ the defendant’s motorman saw…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Menominee River Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hicks v. Citizens' Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Little v. Superior Rapid Transit Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Bradley v. CramerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cawley v. La Crosse City Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bolin v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Tesch v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Reiter v. GroberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Willfong v. Omaha & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API