Legal Opinion

Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Wilmans

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1965No. 5-3483PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This condemnation proceeding arises from a reconstruction project by which part of U.S. Highway 67 has been widened. The landowner, Charles H. Wilmans, formerly operated a liquor store and beer tavern upon a triangular tract of about seven-tenths of an acre, abutting the highway. The effect of the taking is to narrow the tract to such an extent that the tavern can no longer be maintained and the liquor store has an inadequate parking’ area for its customers. The jury awarded Wilmans compensation of $20,000.

According to the original plans for the project a concrete curbing or island, ten…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ark. Highway Commission v. WilmansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Webb v. HerpinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James Dean Walker v. O. E. Bishop, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Arkansas Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Smith v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Henderson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API