Denny v. Public Welfare Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFobt, J.
Petitioner is the son of a public welfare recipient. The defendant determined pursuant to proceedings, the regularity of whieh are not challenged, that he was obligated to contribute to his mother’s support, as provided in OBS ch 416, the Belatives’ Besponsibility Law. Thereafter he sought review in the circuit court, which “concluded that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the defendant Division should be affirmed” and accordingly adopted them. Petitioner appeals.
He contends that he is exempt from liability under OBS 416.030 (2)(b). ① He claims that during at least a part of his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Kerr v. State Public Welfare CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970