In re Darling
New York Supreme Court
Motion for writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtGoff, J.
A former application for a writ of mandamus having been made by petitioner and denied because it did not set forth evidentiary facts sufficient to warrant the relief sought, he now renews his application on other motion papers for the same relief, that is to say, for a writ directed to the respondents, as civil service commissioners of the city of Dew York, commanding them to revoke their certification to the trustees of Bellevue and allied hospitals for appointment of an X-ray photographer, and to set aside a competitive examination for that position. ‘Such an examination was held on January…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- People Ex Rel. Balcom v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- People Ex Rel. McCabe v. . MatthiesNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Allaire v. KnoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- People ex rel. Orr v. ScannellNew York Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Howe v. Civil Service Commission of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Reading v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Donohue v. CorneliusNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Furman v. MarshNew York Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.