Legal Opinion
Moring v. . Little
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 5, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion
This was a motion by the plaintiffs, to reinstate an appeal, dismissed at the February Term, 1886, of this Court. The motion was entered at the last Term, and heard at the October Term, 1886. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The appeal in this case was, at the last Term, on motion of-appellees’ counsel, dismissed, for an alleged insufficient justification of the undertaking, and at the same time, a motion was made to reinstate on the docket, the hearing of which was, by consent, deferred to the present Term. It has now been argued, and our attention called to the concluding part of the case stated by the Court, which was inadvertently overlooked when the order of dismission was made:
“Plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court. Notice of appeal waived. Bond on appeal fixed at fifty dollars. Bond filed.
H. G. CONNOR,
Ju…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gruber Ex Rel. Gruber v. Washington & Jamesville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lower Creek Drainage Commissioners v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920