Legal Opinion

State v. Kalb

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1860PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPE AL from the Gibson Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Prosecution for selling liquor to a minor. Acquittal.

W. P. Edson, for the state.

On the trial, the Court permitted the defendant to prove that James Welborn, the minor to whom the liquor was sold, had the personal appearance of a man over twenty-one years of age.

This is complained of as error.

The statute prohibits the sale of liquor to a minor, and authorizes the sale to adults. It does not prescribe the mode by which the liquor-seller is to determine the question of age, and it may often be a difficult one.

Is the seller to ask every purchaser his age? Very well. Suppose'the answer states it…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State v. BridgewaterIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Farrell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Payne v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hunter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API