Legal Opinion

Diehm, Katie v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 12, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00830Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KATIE DIEHM, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 18-cv-830-wmc MESSERLI & KRAMER, P.A., Defendant. This is a follow-on lawsuit to a series of cases claiming that that defendant Messerli & Kramer, P.A. (“Messerli”), a national collection law firm, failed to comply with the requirements for a notice to cure and the meaningful involvement by an attorney under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(3).1 Plaintiff Katie Diehm similarly claims Messerli falsely represented or implied that one of its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Paula Casillas v. Madison Avenue Associates, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Raul Avila, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Albert G. Rubin and Van Ru Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Meyers v. Nicolet Restaurant of de Pere, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API