Legal Opinion

Arnal v. Fraser

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 22, 2007No. 26253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We certified David Arnal’s (Father’s) four appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, and consolidated them for briefing purposes. Father raises six issues arising out of four family court orders. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Father and Laura Lawton Fraser (Mother) were divorced by order of the family court on October 17, 2001. The amended final order awarded custody of the parties’ minor child, Samuel, to Mother, granted visitation to Father, required Father to pay child support, divided marital property, and addressed all other issues between the parties.

Father and Mother…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Care & Treatment of McCrackenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. DownsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Kirylik v. KirylikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Arnal v. ArnalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tillman v. OakesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Normandy Corp. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Bell v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. OxnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. OxnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API