Legal Opinion

Moment v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 2000No. Nos. 4D99-2391, 4D99-2422PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

POLEN, J.

We initially per curiam affirmed appellant’s conviction and sentence because we, as did the trial court, believed he waived any objection to the correctness of the scoresheet used at sentencing. Prior to the revocation hearing, the court had judicially noticed the content of prior case files which indicated he had been convicted of delivery of a controlled substance. While he did not object at this time, later at sentencing he testified that he had previously been convicted of possession, not delivery. On further review, we hold that this testimony was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Cirillo v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Banks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Hubbs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fay v. CraigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. D.R. v. Dep't of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Moment v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API