Special Indemnity Fund v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
At issue in this proceeding is the correctness of the trial tribunal’s order commuting into a lump sum one-fourth of the unpaid balance due claimant under an accumulative award against the Special Indemnity Fund (hereinafter called Fund).
As a result of a mishap which occurred when he was still in high school claimant lost the sight of his left eye. While at ■work for the last employer on July 31, 1960, ■he sustained an accidental injury to his right arm which required an amputation. In the compensation proceeding against the last employer claimant recovered on No vember 10,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Beatty v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Fullhart Maytag Company v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Special Indemnity Fund v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Special Indemnity Fund v. DaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Special Indemnity Fund v. HaroldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Blackwell Zinc Company v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Special Indemnity Fund v. LitterellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Special Indemnity Fund v. HaroldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964