Legal Opinion

Special Indemnity Fund v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1962No. 39708PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

At issue in this proceeding is the correctness of the trial tribunal’s order commuting into a lump sum one-fourth of the unpaid balance due claimant under an accumulative award against the Special Indemnity Fund (hereinafter called Fund).

As a result of a mishap which occurred when he was still in high school claimant lost the sight of his left eye. While at ■work for the last employer on July 31, 1960, ■he sustained an accidental injury to his right arm which required an amputation. In the compensation proceeding against the last employer claimant recovered on No vember 10,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Beatty v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Fullhart Maytag Company v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. DaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. HaroldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Blackwell Zinc Company v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. LitterellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. HaroldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API