Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Chicago Transit Authority
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 11, 1986No. 85 C 2595PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETZENDANNER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Joanne Mary Murphy, a former Chicago Transit Authority (“CTA”) staff attorney, filed a three-count action against the CTA and seven of its employees seeking compensatory and punitive damages for sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Count I), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count II), and willful and wanton conduct (Count III). Subject matter jurisdiction is predicated on 42 U.S.C. § 2000e and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In a Memorandum Opinion and Order from this court dated October 21, 1985,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wilfredo Martinez, A/K/A Wilfredo Martinez Rodriguez v. Rafael Colon, A/K/A Rafael Colon PizarroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Edwards v. Wallace Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Woodward v. City of WorlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Barbara Monsky, for Herself and on Behalf of All Women Similarly Situated v. Honorable Howard J. MoraghanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Johnson v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.