Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Ediu. E. Porterfield, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This suit is one to recover the balance of commissions and money paid out by plaintiffs, who were co-partners, as agents and brokers for the defendant in purchasing and selling grain on the Kansas City Board of Trade, defendant having paid plaintiffs one hundred dollars on the account. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant and plaintiffs have appealed. The defendant set up in his answer that the contracts out of which plaintiffs ’ demands grew were wagering or gambling transactions made unlawful 'by section 4780, Revised Statutes 1909.

Plaintiffs were brokers buying and selling…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Northrup v. Mississippi Valley InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. St. Louis Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n v. DelanoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Connor v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. McDearmott v. SedgwickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elmore-Schultz Grain Co. v. StonebrakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Hodgson v. PixleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Price v. Estate of BarnesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Yontz v. McVeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. McVean v. WehmeierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API