Legal Opinion

Canfield v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1935No. Claim No. 23587Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed on the facts and new findings made. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment we exercise the power given us by section 584 of the Civil Practice Act to reverse certain findings and make new findings. (Ely v. Barrett, 224 N. Y. 550; Rives v. Bartlett, 215 id. 33, 38; Reich v. Cochran, 196 App. Div. 248, 254; appeal dismissed, 236 N. Y. 576; writ of error dismissed, 265 U. S. 574; Fraser v. Kent, 194 App. Div. 742.) All concur. (The judgment dismisses a claim for personal injuries caused by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reich v. CochranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Ely v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Fraser v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API