P.J.W. v. D.A.H.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSundby, J.
P.J.W., who has reached majority, seeks a determination that D.A.H. is his father. He also *125seeks from D.A.H. back child support from the time of his birth. Relying on Gerhardt v. Estate of Moore, 139 Wis. 2d 833, 407 N.W.2d 895 (1987),1 the trial court dismissed P.J.W.'s action on res judicata grounds, concluding that his action is barred by an illegitimacy settlement agreement under sec. 52.28, Stats. (1967).
Because D.A.H. denied paternity, P.J.W.'s paternity could not be determined under sec. 52.28, Stats. (1967). We therefore conclude that the illegitimacy settlement agreement does not bar…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Halmu v. HalmuWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Lowry v. LowrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Hanneken v. Dixon Distributing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.