Flowers v. Dean
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge
I concur in the result. I acknowledge that “a claim on appeal that the damages were inadequate will not be reviewed unless such a claim was first presented to the trial court by a motion for new trial.” Najor v. Pensacola Pools, Inc., 607 So.2d 294, 295 (Ala.Civ.App.1992). In the present case, the Flowerses filed a motion for a new trial asserting, among other things, “that the verdict [was] contrary to the evidence.” Because the verdict was in the Flowerses’ favor, their motion clearly attacked the amount of damages awarded. Thus, I conclude that the allegations in the Flowerses’ motion for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ashbee v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Barnett v. SainCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Najor v. Pensacola Pools, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992