Mitchell v. Chenault
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 25 — Action by C. C. Ohenault, Receiver, upon the Bond of R. A. Mitchell, as Assignee APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendants Appeal.
Read the full summary
Case 25 — Action by C. C. Ohenault, Receiver, upon the Bond of R. A. Mitchell, as Assignee APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendants Appeal. The appellee, C. C. Ohenault, was the duly qualified receiver of the Montgomery circuit court, and at the April term, 1900, of said court, an order was entered in the suit of the Standard Oil Co. v. McCloskey, &c., then pending in said court, directing R. A. Mitchell, as assignee of McCloskey, to pay said Ohenault, ,as receiver of said court, the sum of $539.03, and if he failed to .pay same in ten days, the receiver was…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion oe the court by
JUDGE DURBLLE
Reversing.
The appellee, as receiver of the Montgomery circuit court, brought suit against appellant Mitchell,. as assignee of M. McCloskey, and L. T. Chiles, surety upon Mitchell’s bond, for $539.03, alleging that at the April term, 1900, an order was entered directing Chenault, a© receiver, to collect from Mitchell that sum, and directing, further,, that if not paid within ten days the receiver should institute a suit upon Mitchell’s bond; that, though demand had been made, the sum had not been paid; that Mitchell had received it as assignee of McCloskey’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- May v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kentucky Heating Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Rapp Lumber Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Elkhorn Land & Improvements Co. v. RatliffeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918