Legal Opinion
Jones v. Grieg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 24, 2003No. 98-CV-1141, 98-CV-1391PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge.
These consolidated appeals involve the validity of a tax sale of a piece of real property. Appellant Michael Jones is the personal representative of the Estate of Hugh E. Jones, the record owner. In response to a motion for summary judg ment filed by appellee Grieg, 1 Mr. Jones claimed that the tax sale was invalid because the record owner (his father) had not been properly notified of the expiration of his right of redemption. Although neither appellee presented any evidence to refute this assertion, the trial court granted their respective motions for summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Malone v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Boddie v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Keatts v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Moore v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Doe v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Harris v. NORTHBROOK CONDOMINIUM IIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- RUPSHA 2007, LLC v. KellumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- CCD-SAT, INC. v. PrattDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009