Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Heil
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
■SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action by a fireman against his employer, the railway company, for the negligence of his fellow servant, the engineer, whereby he lost ;one of his hands. It arose in a jurisdiction in which the fellow-servant doctrine has been abolished. At the trial a physician had testified that he had made an examination of the stump of the plaintiff’s wrist at the preceding term of the court, and the railway company complains of the admission of the doctor’s testimony, to the effect that he found two or three suppurating holes at the end of the stump as large as the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- City of Manning v. German Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Homestake Min. Co. v. FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Southern Pac. Co. v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. YountCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Highway Trailer Co. v. City of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Reliable Auto Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. NiemannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Kurn v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.