Legal Opinion

In re Riccardi

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1923No. Civ. No. 4642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPLICATION for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law after disbarment. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

This is an application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law after disbarment.

From the record it appears that petitioner was convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and sentenced to be imprisoned in the state penitentiary. After serving a portion of his sentence he was, on the twenty-fourth day of December, 1922, granted a full pardon by the Governor of the state. Attached to the petition are numerous testimonials from officials and other persons recommending the reinstatement of the applicant. On the other hand certain protests have been filed against such action. [1]…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State Bar v. RiccardiNevada Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API