Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Johnson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 2006No. 4165PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KITTREDGE, J.:

In this foreclosure action, the property was sold, by way of court order, subject to the successful bidder paying the past due property taxes and assessments. The sale resulted in surplus funds. Following the sale, Bruce Johnson, the successful bidder, sought to defeat the previously unchallenged court order and avoid responsibility for the taxes and assessments. Johnson argued to the Master, and now to us, that section 12-49-60 of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2005) requires the payment of the taxes and assessments from the surplus funds. The Master followed the order under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Collins Ex Rel. Quality Processing, Inc. v. SigmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. QHG of Lake City, Inc. v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. In Re Wilson. Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. CarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Trustees of Wofford College v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re MadisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API