Legal Opinion
Adam Gaff v. Indiana-Purdue University of Fort Wayne
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 2015No. 02A03-1504-PL-136PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
Statement of the Case
[1] Adam Gaff appeals the trial court’s grant of Indiana University-Purdue University of Fort Wayne’s (“IPFWs”) motion for summary judgment. Gaff raises four issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as the following three issues:
1. Whether the trial court erred when it concluded that Gaffs federal constitutional claims were not permissi- ■ ble under 42 U.S.C. § 1983;
2. Whether the trial court erred when it concluded that Gaffs state constitutional claims failed as a matter of law; and
3. Whether the trial court erred, when it granted Purdue’s motion…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Adam Gaff v. Indiana-Purdue University of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 2016